U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Ida Hawkins v. Joe Hairston

Ida Hawkins v. Joe Hairston
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2013

Ida Hawkins v. Joe Hairston

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1156

IDA HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JOE HAIRSTON; JOAN MURPHY; MARGARET A. HOWIE; LAWRENCE SCHMIDT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01366-JKB)

Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ida Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew G. Scott, Lisa Y.

Settles, Leslie Robert Stellman, PESSIN & KATZ, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ida Hawkins appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawkins v. Hairston, No. 1:12-cv-01366- JKB (D. Md. Nov. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.