U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. William Johnson

United States v. William Johnson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2013 · Gregory, Duncan, Davis
531 F. App'x 305

Counsel

William Joe Johnson, Appellant pro se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. William Johnson

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Joe Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 4:10-cr-00941-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be *306 fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.