U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Rufus Houser

United States v. Rufus Houser
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 28, 2013

United States v. Rufus Houser

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RUFUS HOUSER, a/k/a Pookie, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:95-cr-00012-JPB-3)

Submitted: June 18, 2013 Decided: June 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rufus Houser, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rufus Houser appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Houser, No. 3:95-cr- 00012-JPB-3 (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.