United States v. Darryl Proctor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Darryl Proctor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DARRYL MAYES PROCTOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (7:07-cr-00711-TMC-1)

Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: January 8, 2014

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Mayes Proctor, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Elizabeth Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darryl Mayes Proctor appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a sentence reduction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Proctor, No. 7:07-cr-00711-TMC-1 (D.S.C. June 13,

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished