United States v. Jerrell Thomas
United States v. Jerrell Thomas
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7328
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JERRELL ANTONIO THOMAS, a/k/a Baby Huey,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3)
Submitted: January 7, 2014 Decided: January 14, 2014
Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to compel the filing of a motion for
sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas,
No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished