Carroll Gaylord v. Michael Stouffer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Carroll Gaylord v. Michael Stouffer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7274

CARROLL GAYLORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL J. STOUFFER, Commissioner; CORIZON, INC., f/k/a C.M.S., Medical Care Provider; BOBBY SHEARIN, Warden, N.B.C.I.; MD COLIN OTTEY, Dr., N.B.C.I.; GREGG FLURY, P.A., N.B.C.I.; D. ADAMS, Head Nurse; MONICA METHENY, RN; STEVEN BRAY, RN; AUTUMN DURST, RN; TIMBELIE ADAMS, RN; WILLIAM BEEMAN, RN; BREANNA BROWN, RN, N.B.C.I.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:12-cv-02477-DKC)

Submitted: December 20, 2013 Decided: January 15, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carroll Gaylord, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Patricia H. Beall, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Carroll Gaylord appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment to Defendants on his claims of

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006), and denying his motion filed pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Gaylord v. Stouffer, No. 8:12-cv-02477-

DKC (D. Md. June 12, 2013; July 11, 2013). We deny Gaylord’s

motions to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished