George Washington v. Sykes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

George Washington v. Sykes

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7321

GEORGE CHRISTOPHER WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SYKES; S. MESSER, Officer; POWERS, Officer; VICKIE MULLINS; DELLERAY POWER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:12-cv-00437-NKM-RSB)

Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Christopher Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Carlene Booth Johnson, PERRY LAW FIRM, PC, Dillwyn, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George Christopher Washington appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006)

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Washington v. Sykes, No. 7:12-cv-00437-NKM-

RSB (W.D. Va. July 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished