Charlie Richardson v. Ray Mabus

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charlie Richardson v. Ray Mabus

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2144

CHARLIE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAY MABUS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:13-cv-01207-AW)

Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 23, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charlie Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields- Minnis, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charlie Richardson appeals the district court’s order

granting Ray Mabus’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

for summary judgment, on Richardson’s discrimination and

retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17

(West 2003 & Supp. 2012), and the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967, as amended,

29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621

to 634

(West 2008 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. Richardson v. Mabus, No. 8:13-cv-01207-AW (D.

Md. Aug. 16, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished