U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Latrenda Dinote Fleming

United States v. Latrenda Dinote Fleming
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 24, 2014

United States v. Latrenda Dinote Fleming

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7668

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LATRENDA DINOTE FLEMING, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:10-cr-00449-AJT-1)

Submitted: January 21, 2014 Decided: January 24, 2014

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latrenda Dinote Fleming, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Nathanson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Latrenda Dinote Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying her self-styled Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fleming, No. 1:10-cr-00449-AJT-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 10, 2013; entered Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.