William Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corporation
William Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corporation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2356
WILLIAM VERRINDER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Verrinder, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Verrinder appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his complaint for wrongful termination and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., No.
1:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 & Nov. 4, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished