William Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

William Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2356

WILLIAM VERRINDER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WAL-MART CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Verrinder, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Verrinder appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his complaint for wrongful termination and

denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Verrinder v. Wal-Mart Corp., No.

1:13-cv-00395-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Aug. 2 & Nov. 4, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished