U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Donikki Hardy

United States v. Donikki Hardy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 27, 2014

United States v. Donikki Hardy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7420

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DONIKKI HARDY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donikki Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Donikki Hardy appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012) motion for reduction of sentence on the basis of the Fair Sentencing Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s ruling and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reason stated by the district court. United States v. Hardy, No. 7:01-cr-00235-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). In addition, we note that Hardy’s claim is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280 (4th Cir. 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.