United States v. Daniel Buie

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Daniel Buie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6339

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANIEL RAY BUIE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:08-cr-00964-TLW-1)

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Ray Buie, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daniel Ray Buie appeals the district court’s order

granting the government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion and

reducing his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the Amended Judgment.

See United States v. Davis,

679 F.3d 190, 197

(4th Cir. 2012)

(holding that district court may consider

18 U.S.C. § 3553

(a)

(2012) factors “when deciding the extent of [a] sentence

reduction after granting [a] Rule 35(b) motion.”). We deny

Buie’s motion for appointment of counsel, and we dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished