Joseph Ladeairous v. Eddie Pearson
Joseph Ladeairous v. Eddie Pearson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7861
JOSEPH MICHAEL LADEAIROUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDDIE PEARSON, Warden of Sussex I Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00307-JAG)
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 28, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Michael Ladeairous, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Joseph Michael Ladeairous appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) for failure to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ladeairous v. Pearson, No. 3:12-cv-00307-JAG (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.