William Coleman v. 16th Circuit Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

William Coleman v. 16th Circuit Court

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7282

WILLIAM T. COLEMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

16TH CIRCUIT COURT; YORK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE; MELISSA INZERILLO, others may be amended; JESSICA HOLLAND; LEE ALFRED, 16th Circuit Court Judge; 16TH CIRCUIT SOLICITORS OFFICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:12-cv-01927-JFA)

Submitted: January 27, 2014 Decided: February 4, 2014

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William T. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William T. Coleman appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. We conclude, as did magistrate judge and the

district court, that Coleman’s Section 1983 claims are barred by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Heck v. Humphrey,

512 U.S. 477, 486-87

(1994). We therefore affirm the judgment of the district

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished