U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Wayne Resper v. Sires

Wayne Resper v. Sires
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 6, 2014

Wayne Resper v. Sires

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7302

WAYNE RESPER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SIRES, Sgt., N.B.C.I.; COLIN OTTEY; AUTUMN DURST; STEVEN BRAY; DIANNA HARVEY; GREG FLURY; THERESA BRENNEMAN, Defendants – Appellees, and N.B.C.I. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT; DANA PRATT, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-00719-PJM)

Submitted: January 30, 2014 Decided: February 6, 2014

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Patricia H. Beall, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. Sires, No. 8:12-cv-00719-PJM (D. Md. July 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.