Paul Seelig v. Alvin Keller
Paul Seelig v. Alvin Keller
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7121
PAUL E. SEELIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALVIN KELLER; ROBERT LEWIS; PAULA SMITH; GIBBS; MARK SCHUMAN; JAMES WIGGINS; DR. BELL; M. CRUDUP, Correctional Officer; MCRAE, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE 1-100, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE 1 - 100, Correctional Officer; ELIZABETH THOMPSON; NINA SEALS; ALPHONSIA D. COGDELL; JOHN D. FLOYD; MACRE CRIDER; SERGEANT KUHN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03243-BO)
Submitted: January 24, 2014 Decided: February 11, 2014
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul E. Seelig, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Francisco Joseph Benzoni, Timothy Power Lehan, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Paul E. Seelig appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) civil rights action
without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Seelig v. Keller, No. 5:11-ct-03243-BO
(E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished