Paul Seelig v. Alvin Keller

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Paul Seelig v. Alvin Keller

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7121

PAUL E. SEELIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ALVIN KELLER; ROBERT LEWIS; PAULA SMITH; GIBBS; MARK SCHUMAN; JAMES WIGGINS; DR. BELL; M. CRUDUP, Correctional Officer; MCRAE, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE 1-100, Correctional Officer; JANE DOE 1 - 100, Correctional Officer; ELIZABETH THOMPSON; NINA SEALS; ALPHONSIA D. COGDELL; JOHN D. FLOYD; MACRE CRIDER; SERGEANT KUHN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03243-BO)

Submitted: January 24, 2014 Decided: February 11, 2014

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul E. Seelig, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Andrew Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Francisco Joseph Benzoni, Timothy Power Lehan, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Paul E. Seelig appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) civil rights action

without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Seelig v. Keller, No. 5:11-ct-03243-BO

(E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished