United States v. Ernest Perry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ernest Perry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7806

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERNEST PERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00399-HEH-1)

Submitted: February 7, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014

Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, David Vincent Harbach, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ernest Perry appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by

the district court. ∗ See United States v. Goodwyn,

596 F.3d 233

(4th Cir. 2010); United States v. Perry, No. 3:08-cr-00399-HEH-1

(E.D. Va. Sept. 22, 2013; Sept. 13, 2013). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ We note that Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) does not apply to a criminal motion under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

. See United States v. Goodwyn,

596 F.3d 233

, 235 n.* (4th Cir. 2010).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished