Ramona Osborn v. United States
Ramona Osborn v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2385
RAMONA CLAIRE OSBORN; JOHN HENRY OSBORN, II; ROBERTA LYNN OSBORN, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02159-RDB)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramona Claire Osborn, John Henry Osborn, II, and Roberta Lynn Osborn, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ramona Claire Osborn, John Henry Osborn, II, and Roberta Lynn Osborn appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Osborn v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-02159-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.