James Carr v. Evelyn Seifert
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
James David Wesley Carr appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carr v. Seifert, No. 3:13—cv-00040-GMG-JSK (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James David Wesley CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn SEIFERT, Warden; Nicky Seifert, Unit Manager; David Ballard, Warden, M.O.C.C.; John P. Sullivan, P.D.; Don Morris, D.A.; David Proctor, M.D., Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished