U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Iris Gantt v. Colvin Morgan

Iris Gantt v. Colvin Morgan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2014

Iris Gantt v. Colvin Morgan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2168

IRIS SAPP GANTT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COLVIN THOMAS MORGAN, a/k/a Tom Morgan, a/k/a C. T. Morgan, a/k/a Colvin T. Morgan; THURMO MEDICAL SLEEP PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Iris Sapp Gantt, Appellant Pro Se. John F. Bloss, HIGGINS BENJAMIN PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina; Daniel Charles Nash, MORGAN, HERRING, MORGAN, GREEN & ROSENBLUTT, LLC, High Point, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Iris Sapp Gantt, a pro se civil litigant, appeals the district court’s order dismissing Gantt’s civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Durden v. United States, 736 F.3d 296, 300 (4th Cir. 2013) (stating that dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gantt v. Morgan, No. 1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.