UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2290

In Re: ARTHUR RODGERS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cv-02902-CCB)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Rodgers, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arthur Rodgers petitions for a writ of mandamus,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in

processing his

(2006) civil rights action and

in adjudicating his motion for injunctive relief. He seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act. Our

review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district

court has both denied the motion for a preliminary injunction

and dismissed Rodgers’ complaint. Accordingly, because the

district court has recently decided Rodgers’ case, the mandamus

petition, as amended, is moot, and we deny it on that basis. We

grant Rodgers’ request for leave to file an out-of-time

supplement to his mandamus petition. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2