U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Gregory Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Gregory Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2014

Gregory Richardson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7330

GREGORY RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-00275-REP)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Gregory Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying authorization to file his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. Richardson is required to file a motion for leave to file a complaint under a pre-filing injunction imposed by the district court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Richardson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Richardson’s motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Commonwealth of Va., No. 3:13-cv-00275-REP (E.D. Va. July 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.