Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board
Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2313
AHMAD HALIM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ANDRES ALONSO; NEIL E. DUKE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-02265-WMN)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ahmad Halim, Appellant Pro Se. Randi Klein Hyatt, Darrell Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ahmad Halim appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims of
age, religion, and national origin discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Halim
v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:11-cv-02265-WMN (D. Md.
Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished