U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board

Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 25, 2014

Ahmad Halim v. Baltimore City Board

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2313

AHMAD HALIM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS, Defendant - Appellee, and ANDRES ALONSO; NEIL E. DUKE, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-02265-WMN)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ahmad Halim, Appellant Pro Se. Randi Klein Hyatt, Darrell Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ahmad Halim appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendants on his claims of age, religion, and national origin discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Halim v. Balt. City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:11-cv-02265-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.