United States v. William Cross
United States v. William Cross
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7802
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Cross appeals the district court’s margin
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion * for
reconsideration of the district court’s 2003 order denying his
motion to dismiss criminal charges for lack of jurisdiction. We
have reviewed the record in this appeal and conclude that the
district court did not commit reversible error. United
States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court order that Cross sought reconsideration of was entered in his criminal case, Cross attempted to use a civil rule to effect reconsideration.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished