United States v. William Cross

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. William Cross

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7802

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM TERRENCE CROSS, a/k/a Red,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1)

Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 26, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Terrence Cross, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Cross appeals the district court’s margin

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion * for

reconsideration of the district court’s 2003 order denying his

motion to dismiss criminal charges for lack of jurisdiction. We

have reviewed the record in this appeal and conclude that the

district court did not commit reversible error. United

States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 23,

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court order that Cross sought reconsideration of was entered in his criminal case, Cross attempted to use a civil rule to effect reconsideration.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished