U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Jay Thomas v. Sallie Mae

Jay Thomas v. Sallie Mae
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 4, 2014

Jay Thomas v. Sallie Mae

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2267

JAY L. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SALLIE MAE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:13-cv-02478-DKC)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 4, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jay L. Thomas appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint against Sallie Mae Financial Corporation, Inc., in which he alleged breach of contract and violations of the Rehabilitation Act and Consumer Fraud Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Thomas’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Thomas has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.