Steven Barnes v. Carol Thueme
Steven Barnes v. Carol Thueme
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6011
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES, a/k/a Steve, a/k/a Big Man, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROL G. THUEME, Court Reporter; COURT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (5:13-cv-02349-RMG)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Louis Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Steven Louis Barnes appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnes v. Thueme, No. 5:13-cv-02349-RMG (D.S.C. Oct. 25 & Dec. 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.