Monty Wright v. William Muse
Monty Wright v. William Muse
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7825
MONTY E. WRIGHT, a/k/a Monty E. Hamlor, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM W. MUSE, Chairman; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:13-cv-00344-JCT-RSB)
Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monty Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Monty E. Wright appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2012). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We conclude that the order is final and appealable as no amendment to the complaint could cure the defects identified by the district court. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.