U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Sandra Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Sandra Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 2014

Sandra Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2201

SANDRA LEE BARCUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00724-CCB)

Submitted: February 27, 2014 Decided: March 18, 2014

Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra Lee Barcus, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Bess, VEDDER PRICE, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Sandra Lee Barcus appeals the district court’s order granting Sears, Roebuck & Co.’s motion for summary judgment on her claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barcus v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., No. 1:12-cv-00724-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2013). Additionally, we deny Barcus’ request for leave to amend her complaint to add additional employment discrimination claims. See Cozzarelli v. Inspire Pharm., Inc., 549 F.3d 618, 630-31 (4th Cir. 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.