U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

William Fitchett v. Alan Wilson

William Fitchett v. Alan Wilson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2014

William Fitchett v. Alan Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2333

WILLIAM FITCHETT; BRAD R. JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ALAN WILSON; M. LOIS EARGLE; RODDY DICKINSON; TIM CHRISTOPHER; COUNTY OF HORRY STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:12-cv-00605-RBH)

Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 19, 2014

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Fitchett, Brad R. Johnson, Appellants Pro Se. Jerome Scott Kozacki, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William Fitchett and Brad R. Johnson appeal the district court’s order and judgment adopting in part the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing their civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fitchett v. Wilson, No. 4:12-cv-00605- RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.