U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Pensicola Banks v. John McHugh

Pensicola Banks v. John McHugh
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 2014

Pensicola Banks v. John McHugh

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2188

PENSICOLA BANKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary, Department of the Army, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00032-JFA)

Submitted: February 19, 2014 Decided: March 20, 2014

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pensicola Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Pensicola Banks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant summary judgment in Banks’s civil action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. McHugh, No. 3:12-cv-00032-JFA (D.S.C. Aug.

23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.