U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Michael Williams

United States v. Michael Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 2014

United States v. Michael Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7913

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL CRANDALE WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Malcolm J.

Howard, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00009-H-1)

Submitted: March 6, 2014 Decided: March 26, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and reducing his sentence to the low end of his amended Guidelines range. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00009-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Williams contends he is entitled to a further reduction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.