U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Michael McNeil v. v. Markuski, Jr.

Michael McNeil v. v. Markuski, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 27, 2014

Michael McNeil v. v. Markuski, Jr.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2269

MICHAEL A. MCNEIL, Debtor - Appellant, v. V. PETER MARKUSKI, JR., Defendant – Appellee, and BRIAN ARTHUR GOLDMAN; NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, Trustees.

No. 13-2276

MICHAEL A. MCNEIL, Debtor - Appellant, v. STEPHEN A. DRAZIN, Defendant – Appellee, and BRIAN A. GOLDMAN; NANCY SPENCER GRIGSBY, Trustees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-03706-WDQ; 1:12-cv-03819-WDQ)

Submitted: March 25, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. McNeil, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Wayne Bernstein, GOOZMAN, BERNSTEIN & MARKUSKI, Laurel, Maryland; Stephen A.

Drazin, Columbia, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Michael A. McNeil appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders overruling his objections to proofs of claim in his bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeil v. Markuski, No. 1:12-cv-03706-WDQ; McNeil v. Drazin, No. 1:12-cv-03819-WDQ (D. Md. Oct. 10, 2013).

We deny McNeil’s motion to strike Appellee’s informal brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.