Antonio Bradley v. Salisbury Police Department
Antonio Bradley v. Salisbury Police Department
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-8061
ANTONIO BRADLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SALISBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT; BRYN MAWR, Officer; CORPORAL UNDERWOOD; B. CATON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03364-GLR)
Submitted: March 17, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Bradley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Antonio Bradley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bradley v. Salisbury Police Dep’t, No. 1:13-cv-03364-GLR (D. Md. Dec. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.