U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Samad Harvey

United States v. Samad Harvey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 31, 2014

United States v. Samad Harvey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4570

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. SAMAD MADIR HARVEY, a/k/a Wes, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00005-IMK-JSK-1)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: March 31, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Richard Walker, Senior Litigator, Kristen Leddy, Research and Writing Specialist, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellant.

Zelda E. Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Samad Madir Harvey appeals from his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial. We review the district court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Smith, 451 F.3d 209, 216 (4th Cir. 2006). We have carefully considered the parties’ briefs on appeal and the record, and we conclude that the district court’s reasoning was appropriate and contained no abuse of discretion. (See J.A. at 326-43). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.