U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Bruce Richardson

United States v. Bruce Richardson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2014

United States v. Bruce Richardson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8050

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BRUCE LEE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K.

Reidinger, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00010-MR-1)

Submitted: March 27, 2014 Decided: April 1, 2014

Before MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bruce Lee Richardson appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to compel and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2013; Dec. 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.