U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

In re: Randall Conrad v.

In re: Randall Conrad v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2014

In re: Randall Conrad v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1084

In Re: RANDALL LEE CONRAD, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:04-cr-00297-NCT-1; 1:07-cv-00313-NCT-WWD)

Submitted: April 8, 2014 Decided: April 11, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Lee Conrad, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Randall Lee Conrad petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)(3) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.