U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Joseph Kirzhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC

Joseph Kirzhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 15, 2014

Joseph Kirzhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2285

JOSEPH KIRZHNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PUREPOWER TECHNOLOGIES LLC, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-01802-MBS)

Submitted: March 31, 2014 Decided: April 15, 2014

Before KING, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Kirzhner, Appellant Pro Se. Jade Cobb Murray, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joseph Kirzhner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to PurePOWER Technologies LLC on his complaint asserting violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2006 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirzhner v. PurePOWER Technologies LLC, No. 3:12-cv-01802-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.