U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Janelle Hill v. Sanofi-Aventis

Janelle Hill v. Sanofi-Aventis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2014

Janelle Hill v. Sanofi-Aventis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2169

JANELLE HILL, Individually and as the Next Friend of S.A.H.; WILLIAM HILL, Individually and as the Next Friend of S.A.H., Plaintiffs - Appellees,

SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., INC., Defendant – Appellee, v. MEDCON, INC., Intervenor – Appellant, and KENNETH EDWARD LABOWITZ, Guardian ad litem for S.A.H., Party Below.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00463-CMH-TRJ)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 21, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joshua Harry Erlich, ERLICH LAW OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellant. Janelle Hill, Ozona, Florida; William Hill, Norfolk, Virginia; Syed Mohsin Reza, Mary Catherine Zinsner, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Medcon, Inc. appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to intervene in a closed civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Sanofi-Aventis, No. 1:09-cv-00463-CMH-TRJ (E.D.

Va. filed Aug. 13, 2013; entered Aug. 14, 2013). Medcon’s motion to strike Janelle Hill’s informal brief is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.