U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Ronald Eustach

United States v. Ronald Eustach
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2014

United States v. Ronald Eustach

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7910

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. RONALD EUSTACH, a/k/a Tony Stracan, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Eustach, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Nancy Chastain Wicker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ronald Eustach appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions for reconsideration of his criminal judgment filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eustach, No. 4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 18 & Oct. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.