Carol Schulte v. Joseph Murtha
Carol Schulte v. Joseph Murtha
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1908
CAROL SCHULTE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOSEPH MURTHA; RUTH JAKUBOWSKI; KAREN PILARSKI, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02919-RDB)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carol Schulte, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Carol Schulte appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schulte v. Murtha, No. 1:12-cv-02919-RDB (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2013; June 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.