U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Randall Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Randall Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2014

Randall Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6134

RANDALL LEE CONRAD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; DEPT. OF JUSTICE; R. A. PERDUE, Warden; MR. CREASY, Counselor; MS. WILSON, Secretary; MRS. THROPE, Officer, Defendants – Appellees, and NUMEROUS FCI GILMER EMPLOYEES, Officers, Secretaries, Counselors, Case Managers, etc., Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00133-GMG-JES)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall Lee Conrad, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Randall Lee Conrad appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Conrad v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 3:12-cv-00133- GMG-JES (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 6, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.