James Strouse v. E. Wilson
James Strouse v. E. Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6423
JAMES STROUSE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. E. D. WILSON, Warden; BERNARDO, SIS; LAGRONE, SIS; BLACKBURN, Counselor; BENNETT, DHO; HOLDERFIELD, SIS, Respondents – Appellees, and BUREAU OF PRISONS; KEVIN KIDDY, Unit Manager; MENDEZ, SIS; GENTRY, SIS, Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-00653-REP)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Strouse, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James Strouse, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strouse v. Wilson, No. 3:12-cv-00653-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.