U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Stephen Satcher v. Karen Hogsten

Stephen Satcher v. Karen Hogsten
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 24, 2014

Stephen Satcher v. Karen Hogsten

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7789

STEPHEN D. SATCHER, Petitioner – Appellant, v. KAREN F. HOGSTEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00466)

Submitted: April 28, 2014 Decided: June 24, 2014

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Satcher, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Stephen D. Satcher, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Satcher’s claim is without merit. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.