United States v. Dacious Smith
United States v. Dacious Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DACIOUS LAMONT SMITH, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cr-00045-F-1)
Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dacious Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Banumathi Rangarajan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dacious Lamont Smith appeals the district court’s orders granting in part and denying in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 7:08-cr-00045-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.