U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Gregory Hines v. Warden Mathena

Gregory Hines v. Warden Mathena
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 10, 2014

Gregory Hines v. Warden Mathena

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7918

GREGORY S. HINES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA; HAROLD W. CLARKE, VADOC, Director; EBP ISRAEL HAMILTON, Re-Entry Institutional Program Manager; JEFFERY ARTRIP, Unit Manager D. Bldg; TORI RAIFORD, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:13-cv-00288-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: April 3, 2014 Decided: July 10, 2014

Before DUNCAN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory S. Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Lara Kate Jacobs Todd, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Gregory S. Hines appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hines v. Mathena, No. 7:13-cv-00288-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.