Michael Romero v. Phillip Morgan
Michael Romero v. Phillip Morgan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6516
MICHAEL R. ROMERO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PHILLIP MORGAN, All individually and in their official capacity; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, (DPSCS), All individually and in their official capacity; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, All individually and in their official capacity; CORIZON HEALTH CARE SERVICES, All individually and in their official capacity; SADIK ALI, MD; ASHOK KRISHNASWAMY, MD; OFFICER S. A. WILSON; ASRESAHEGN GETACHEW, MD; BON SECOURS BALTIMORE HEALTH SYSTEMS, All individually and in their official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:13-cv-00625-DKC)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael R. Romero, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland; Jennifer E.
Cameron, Michelle Jacquelyn Marzullo, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael R. Romero appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his claims against Defendants Phillip Morgan and Officer S. A. Wilson and granting summary judgment to Defendants Corizon Health Care Services, Sadik Ali, MD, Asresahegn Getachew, MD, and Wexford Health Sources, Incorporated, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Romero v. Morgan, No. 8:13-cv-00625-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 4 & July 17, 2013; Mar. 20, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.