U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant

John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 29, 2014

John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6517

JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRISTOW MARCHANT; DAVID C. NORTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:13-cv-03439-JFA)

Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baccus v. Marchant, No. 8:13-cv-03439-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2014). We grant Baccus’s motion for judicial notice of records. We deny all other outstanding motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.