John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant
John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6517
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRISTOW MARCHANT; DAVID C. NORTON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:13-cv-03439-JFA)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Roosevelt Baccus appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Baccus v. Marchant, No. 8:13-cv-03439-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2014). We grant Baccus’s motion for judicial notice of records. We deny all other outstanding motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.