U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Roderick English v. Fazal Khan

Roderick English v. Fazal Khan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 29, 2014

Roderick English v. Fazal Khan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6688

RODERICK ENGLISH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. FAZAL KHAN; RICHARD S. JOHNSON; LPN MICHELLE D. FOX; SYLVIA ROBERTS; AMORET FLOYD; JOANN BOARDS; ADRIENNE N. LOGAN; TERRIE LEONARD; RN POWELL; EILEEN DELANY; DONNA LO’DANIEL; T. BENJAMIN ARTHUR E. MCLAMB; ANN M. DWYER; PRAVIN R. PATEL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-02857-JFA)

Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014

Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. English v. Khan, 1:13-cv-02857-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.