Roderick English v. Dr. Beverly Wood
Roderick English v. Dr. Beverly Wood
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6692
RODERICK ENGLISH, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DOCTOR BEVERLY A. WOOD; DONIKIAS GRAY; COUNSELORS MADDOX; WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR.; DOCTOR NOCHO PEREZ; ASHLEY SHARMANE WASHINGTON; DOCTOR FERLUATO, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-02677-JFA)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. English v. Wood, No. 1:13-cv-02677-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.