U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Robert Herbert v. Benjamin Treaster

Robert Herbert v. Benjamin Treaster
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2014 · Shedd, Diaz, Floyd
582 F. App'x 155

Counsel

Robert Fletcher Herbert, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, David Allan DeMasters, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Robert Herbert v. Benjamin Treaster

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Fletcher Herbert appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants Benjamin F. Treaster and Daryl Scott Barber in his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Herbert v. Treaster, No. 3:13-cv-00262-JFA, 2014 WL 1093050 (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.